Hospital quality issues, including levels and variances, are not brand-new. For decades, we’ll have recognized that hospitals vary in their capacity to deliver high-quality treatment to patients. Accreditation has been our country’s primary approach for guaranteeing and enhancing care. The idea is straightforward: use an outside, independent organization that applies objective standards to make sure hospitals are following evidence-based procedures to improve patient outcomes. The effectiveness of this strategy has not been made evident, despite the possibility of good logic.
In September 2016, the criteria of the eyecare organization were introduced. Prior to this, the SHCO program was used to consider eye hospitals for NABH accreditation; however, as time went on, it became clear that the majority of SHCO-related NABH standards did not apply to eyecare organizations due to specific compliance requirements, clinical process requirements, organizational requirements, manpower planning requirements, and equipment management requirements. The main advantages are positive clinical outcomes, highlighting the best clinical practices, analyzing the data for quality improvement, and reducing liabilities through risk management and reduction.
Eye care Organisations are an essential component of the healthcare system, and certification would be the most crucial strategy for raising the standard and safety of eye treatment for patients. Eye surgery complications, such as high post-surgical infection rates, need an emphasis on quality and patient safety at such facilities. Adherence to accrediting criteria in these environments enhances the quality of services, resulting in positive therapeutic results.
Not only should eye care facilities be safe for patients, but also for workers and other stakeholders. Quality and patient safety in eye care organizations is of major concern to government entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), insurance companies, and professional organizations representing healthcare personnel and patients. Accreditation is concerned with establishing quality and safety in relation to predefined requirements. Accreditation motivates eye care organizations to strive for continuous excellence. Organizations must first prepare the documentation in order to acquire accreditation. Here is a list of NABH documents for eye care hospitals may need to be created as part of the accreditation documentation preparations.
- General information brochure
- NABH standard for eye care organization
- policies & procedures for assessment, surveillance, and re-assessment of HCO
- NABH standard accreditation agreement
- policy and guidelines for use of NABH accreditation/ certification mark
- desktop surveillance assessment issue 1
- NABH policy and procedure for focus visits to an accredited hospital
- NABH policy and procedure for surprise visits to an accredited hospital
- NABH policies and procedures for dealing with adverse and other decisions
- procedure for handling appeals
- policy & procedure for handling complaints
- NABH policy and procedure for change of name of an accredited certified healthcare organization
Use the comprehensive NABH document templates for Eye Care Organisation (ECO) from hospitalaccreditation.in to make the documentation development process simple and efficient. The document package contains sample papers that are needed to execute NABH hospital accreditation in accordance with the most recent guidelines from the National Accreditation Board of Hospitals. Many hospitals are successfully assessed, and the papers are created by a highly skilled team of individuals with extensive expertise in hospital system development and process improvement. Because the editable documents are written in plain English and are available for purchase in editable format, it is extremely simple to alter the content of the NABH accreditation handbook, NABH audit checklist, SOPs, formats, etc., and upgrade them in accordance with organizational needs.